Logic DM101

Logic DM101For much of the nineteen seventies and eighties, Linn’s LP12 was the undisputed vinyl king. New title challengers came and went, but the Sondek remained on top. Ironically, because these aspirant monarchs of vinyl didn’t turn out to be quite as good, they ended up unfairly overlooked and ignored. This always seemed strange to me – rather like saying if you’re not Number One in the charts, nobody will play your song on the radio or stock your records…

The upshot is that there’s a large number of fine high end turntables around that most people have either completely forgotten about or never even heard of in the first place. Along with Ariston’s RD11, the JBE and the original Dunlop Systemdek, Logic’s DM101 is just such a deck. No, it isn’t the greatest device ever to spin a Long Playing record, but classic vinyl aficionados should find it well worth a look.

Costing £299 in 1981, it was an expensive piece of kit. Like the Linn it was a well finished, belt driven design using the familiar Philips/Impex 24 pole AC synchronous motor, modified with a quarter inch thick steel mounting plate to reduce vibration. The 356x483x153mm plinth was a solid Medite affair finished in satin black, with a wonderfully nineteen seventies smoked Perspex dustcover. Again, ‘a la Linn’, it used a two-piece cast aluminium platter with a hardened steel spindle set into the inner platter. The 2.5kg outer platter was machined to have almost all its mass at the rim, and topped by a Michell Focus-style bonded red felt mat. The aluminium bearing housing contained two plain bronze bushes, together with a hardened steel thrust pad with a ground and lapped face, with a ball concentrically located in the end of the spindle.

This is all pretty conventional stuff, but the Logic’s design had a twist. The 8mm aluminium subchassis took tonearms directly via adaptor plates, obviating the need for sound-degrading armboards. This was then suspended at three points using an ingenious double spring arrangement – both springs were attached to round steel plates at one end, and at the other to brackets mounted opposite each other on the plinth, meaning the brackets hung in the middle. This meant that if the chassis movement caused one spring to compress in one direction, the other spring would have to extend by the same amount. The result was more effective damping, and less long term drift out of adjustment. Chassis levelling was done by a simple screw adjuster.

Overall then, the Logic was an extremely thoughtful design, a fact born out when you listen to one. Compared to a similar vintage Sondek, the DM101 sounds slightly lighter, faster and breezier, with a firmer bass that lacks just a bit of the LP12’s extension. Move on up the frequency range and there’s noticeably less clutter, with a clearer and more neutral lower midband that images more positively. Soundstaging is tighter with better image location – this was always a weak point of the Sondek – and there’s a touch more detail too. What the Logic doesn’t have is the bounce of its Scottish rival. More interested in neutral, even-handed information retrieval, the DM101 proves less rhythmically and musically engaging, which is probably why hi-fi journalists of the day came out in favour of the Sondek.

Nevertheless, it’s still a highly pleasant listen, especially when you consider how cheap these babies are second-hand. Pay around £250 for a good one, and you’ve got yourself a front end that’s both dramatically better than Regas or Projects, and far superior to any CD player under a grand. Many Logics were partnered with SME IIIs, Mission 774s and Syrinxes, but you can easily fit a modern SME 309 or the ubiquitous Rega if you can find an adaptor plate. The result will be most enjoyable, especially when you remember how little money you’ve spent to get sound this good.

4 comments

  1. I feel to many people put to much emphasis on what the hifi mags used to put out, I always prefered the Logic DM101 to a Linn LP12 and I had the Linn before i had the logic kept reading the hifi mags that said the Linn was better but every time I listened to the Logic it sounded better. Later I switched to a Roksan Xerxes and I would like to tell a little story before I bought the Xerxes I went into a well known HiFi store in London where I had a demo between a Linn LP12 with Ittok and ATOC7 and a Xerxes with Tabriz and another ATOC7. After the demo I said I preferred the Xerxes well the assistant said he when he first had a demo of a Mantra Manticor against the LP12 he prefered the Mantra but now he knows better as he has now learnt the sound of the Linn?. When I told him I still prefered the Xerxes he said to me that I should not be listening to hifi as I did not know what I was doing. I kid you not that’s what happened, well with the money in my pocket busting to get out I managed to keep in in there and ended up buying the Xerxes elsewhere. The moral of the story is that even the shop assistants were into the marketing hype and I heard from an ex-dealer that there was more money to be had selling the Linn than what they got from its competitors.so even though I loved my Linn LP12 before I got my Logic DM101 and would not buy one again. Try and get a blind demo so you can not see what turntable is playing and you will see that there is so much BS about the Linn that I now feel Linn did a dis-service to the hifi industry. It just goes to show how gullible most people are.

    • I think there were clear differences between the LP12, the Xerxes and Manticore – and the Linn was better in some respects and less good in others. The idea that the LP12 was categorically the best in every way – propagated by the press at the time – was errant nonsense, but it was certainly a very strong performer in its own special way.

      I think all the hype from certain hi-fi magazines at that time has rather caused a backlash, and people are loathe to respect the LP12 because it was pushed so hard by certain journalists at a certain time. It really shouldn’t be dismissed out of hand – I am certainly still a fan, although it’s not the deck I use everyday now.

  2. Flavio

    I’m from South America. 1982 went to Graham Audio shop inTotetenham ct rd. I was 15. Listened to the lp12 and the dm101. The dm101 was clear winner for me and left the shop with one and shipped it home. I keep it until this day. Fast forward 20 years and I ended up living in Royal Leamington Spa where they used to manufacture it.

  3. Norm Pearce

    I have a logic tempo fitted with a sme 3009 arm supper sounds had at least 35 “years brill.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: